Comments on: Dev-c++ (dev-cpp) sucks http://blogs.pwmn.net/korkakak/2009/03/24/dev-c-sucks In der Ruhe liegt die Kraft Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:58:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: korki http://blogs.pwmn.net/korkakak/2009/03/24/dev-c-sucks#comment-40 korki Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:13:40 +0000 http://blogs.pwmn.net/korkakak/2009/03/24/dev-c-sucks#comment-40 1) I suppose by commercial probabilities you mean commercial capabilities. 2) dev-cpp or dev c++ is NOT a compiler. It is an IDE (a development enviroment). The compiler for all F/O S IDEs is gcc (gnu C compiler). So I am NOT commenting on the compiler. I am rather saying that dev cpp is outdated (read the first post and below for more info) I haven't considered the per pay IDEs if you have noticed, I only write about Free Open Source projects (at the bottom of my post). Yet they are robust, fully equipped with even greater capabilities that .net development studio could ever implement, or have. And also never forget about the fees ;) As a bottom line, and as a followup to the initial thread dev-c++ sucks greatly in comparison with the other free open source IDEs. Before 2-3 years it might have been acceptable (yet eclipse still existed back then with the full deal of features quite close up to present status quo). For the closed source proprietary ones I don't give a damn (and hopefully I'll never have to). Cheers 1) I suppose by commercial probabilities you mean commercial capabilities.
2) dev-cpp or dev c++ is NOT a compiler. It is an IDE (a development enviroment). The compiler for all F/O S IDEs is gcc (gnu C compiler). So I am NOT commenting on the compiler. I am rather saying that dev cpp is outdated (read the first post and below for more info)

I haven’t considered the per pay IDEs if you have noticed, I only write about Free Open Source projects (at the bottom of my post).

Yet they are robust, fully equipped with even greater capabilities that .net development studio could ever implement, or have. And also never forget about the fees ;)

As a bottom line, and as a followup to the initial thread dev-c++ sucks greatly in comparison with the other free open source IDEs. Before 2-3 years it might have been acceptable (yet eclipse still existed back then with the full deal of features quite close up to present status quo). For the closed source proprietary ones I don’t give a damn (and hopefully I’ll never have to).

Cheers

]]> By: Sipher http://blogs.pwmn.net/korkakak/2009/03/24/dev-c-sucks#comment-39 Sipher Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:37:46 +0000 http://blogs.pwmn.net/korkakak/2009/03/24/dev-c-sucks#comment-39 Listen man. Dev C++ if way ahead for a free compiler with commercial probabilities. Go and buy Visual C++.net or Microsoft C++ ifnot satisfied! Listen man. Dev C++ if way ahead for a free compiler with commercial probabilities. Go and buy Visual C++.net or Microsoft C++ ifnot satisfied!

]]>